#16101: Python backend for Polyhedra
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: geometry | Resolution:
Keywords: days57 | Merged in:
Authors: Volker Braun | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vbraun/double_description | 92290e2f9cd2e4293add0544e763873a4b33fe8f
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:24 vbraun]:
> Really big examples probably need some further improvements to the
implementation. But I'm obviously not going to work on these until the
base implementation is in Sage. We can of course wait years/forever until
everything is perfect and only then merge it with Sage. Or we can release
early, and release often.
I don't think that 600-cell is a big example; it is a 4-dimensional
polytope with 120 vertices!
If about the only example the new codepath is checked on is a plane
triangle, then I say no, this needs work...
Would you like me to construct this test?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16101#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
