#16101: Python backend for Polyhedra
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: geometry | Resolution:
Keywords: days57 | Merged in:
Authors: Volker Braun | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vbraun/double_description | 92290e2f9cd2e4293add0544e763873a4b33fe8f
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vbraun):
Replying to [comment:30 leif]:
> ... which could be seen as an argument to add that example (properly).
;-)
Feel free to open a ticket for your feature request.
Also, even if it were fast enough for a doctest, the 600-cell would be a
terrible way to test the functionality. Field arithmetic is tested
elsewhere, so for *testing* you should use examples over QQ where you
actually have something to compare to...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16101#comment:31>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
