#16430: Small speedup for OA(None,p^c)
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ncohen/16430 | 162b83c0772a9c2a02eb3cea71028e8d14a6c0a7
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yo !
> Everything looks good. I have micro modifs that makes it look better at
u/vdelecroix/16430. If you like it take it. And you can set to positive
review whatever you choose.
I find weird that `IntegerRange` only writes two points in `{0, .., 5}`,
but okay... Is there any reason for that ? `:-P`
{{{
.. SEEALSO::
- :func:`orthogonal_array` -- a tranversal design `TD(k,n)` is
equivalent to an
orthogonal array `OA(k,n,2)`.
}}}
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16430#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
