#16597: Singer difference set and fix OA_9_135
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  combinatorial      |   Resolution:
  designs                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Vincent Delecroix  |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  ec6df26f4d72c5eb939a9b02cd3ad809feacb105
  u/vdelecroix/16597                 |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Replying to [comment:4 ncohen]:
 > - In `OA_9_135` you remove the definition of `PG2 = set([x*39 for x in
 range(7)])` but it still appears in the documentation. And it is nice to
 have an object representing that to describe more clearly what the
 function does.
 >
 >   And you repeat this %39 everywhere right now.

 I will put it back if you prefer. I just remarked that I removed an
 important comment about PG2 being the set of points = 0 mod 39.

 But note that it is faster to test "x%39 == 0" rather than building PG2
 and then test "x in PG2".

 > - {{{The set of `GF(q)` lines in `V` is a projective plane}}}. The set
 of `(q^3-1)/(q-1)=q^2+q+1` lines ? Either way `GF(q)` is not an integer.

 No, `GF(q)` is not a number but a field. It refers to line as line in a
 vector space over `GF(q)`. The very same way you would speak about `RR`
 lines in `CC`. Isn't that clear enough?

 > - {{{+        spaces/.}}}
 > - {{{ Kq (i.e the (q-1)-th root of unity}}}
 >
 > - About the second part of function `singer_difference_set` : what would
 you think of implementing 3.16 instead ? It builds the cyclic difference
 set from a cyclic automorphism of a BIBD... And it could be useful later,
 like when we will have a `BIBD.is_cyclic` function.

 It is stupid. You will have to first build the projective space, then
 compute its automorphism group that we already know and then apply a big
 hammer.

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16597#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to