#16622: Deprecate Hypergraph in favor of IncidenceStructure
-----------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial designs | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Dima :
> What I meant to say is that you can rename things, change the underlying
implementations, etc, as long as you do not remove functions and classes.
> No need to deprecate anything at all. IMHO...
Right now we have a Hypergraph class and an IncidenceStructure class. In
the future it would be good to have only one, i.e. `Hypergraph` and
`IncidenceStructure` should be the same class. I am trying to do this by
telling users to stop using `Hypergraph` for a while and use
`IncidenceStructure` instead, and after one year of deprecation
`Hypergraph` will be an alias for `IncidenceStructure`.
How could we do that without deprecation ?
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16622#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.