#16622: Deprecate Hypergraph in favor of IncidenceStructure
-----------------------------------------+------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen                 |        Owner:
           Type:  defect                 |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major                  |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  combinatorial designs  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                         |    Merged in:
        Authors:                         |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                    |  Work issues:
         Branch:                         |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                         |     Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Dima :

 > What I meant to say is that you can rename things, change the underlying
 implementations, etc, as long as you do not remove functions and classes.
 > No need to deprecate anything at all. IMHO...

 Right now we have a Hypergraph class and an IncidenceStructure class. In
 the future it would be good to have only one, i.e. `Hypergraph` and
 `IncidenceStructure` should be the same class. I am trying to do this by
 telling users to stop using `Hypergraph` for a while and use
 `IncidenceStructure` instead, and after one year of deprecation
 `Hypergraph` will be an alias for `IncidenceStructure`.

 How could we do that without deprecation ?

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16622#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to