#16651: Buggy to_poly_solve option
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: gagern | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Volker Braun | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vbraun/buggy_to_poly_solve | 6fb6bee3a7ef1f692656f615f9361c9e52afeec1
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vbraun):
Considering that there is only so much that you can do for a univariate
polyonomial, I guess its true that you don't benefit from
`to_poly_solve=True` in #14239.
If you have fundamental questions about `NumberFieldElement` you should
post to sage-devel. None of its original authors will read this ticket.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16651#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
