#16456: Bug in descend_to method for elliptic curves
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  cremona            |        Owner:  cremona
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  elliptic curves    |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  elliptic curve     |    Merged in:
  base change                        |    Reviewers:  Peter Bruin
        Authors:  John Cremona       |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  u/cremona/16456    |  3db6c28c3ffb0c9d29eb5fd1e1fe5cd1acbd907f
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by pbruin):

 * reviewer:   => Peter Bruin


Comment:

 I remember looking at the Selmer group code some time ago (and again just
 now) and getting the impression that the group ''K''(''S'', ''m'')
 returned by `selmer_group(S, m)` is the one fitting in a natural exact
 sequence (warning: unicode experiment ahead)

 1 ⟶ O,,''K'',''S'',,^×^/O,,''K'',''S'',,^×''m''^ ⟶ ''K''(''S'', ''m'') ⟶
 Cl,,''K,S'',,[''m''] ⟶ 0.

 (I.e., I think ''K''(''S'', ''m'') should be canonically isomorphic to the
 flat cohomology group H^1^(O,,''K'',,, '''''μ''',,m,,'').  This can be
 replaced by étale cohomology if ''S'' contains all places dividing ''m'',
 and in that case I also think that the above H^1^, and ''K''(''S'',
 ''m''), should be isomorphic to H^1^(Gal(''K^S^''/''K''),
 '''''μ''',,m,,'') with ''K^S^'' the maximal extension of ''K'' that is
 unramified outside ''S''.)

 Is the above exact sequence correct, and should it perhaps be mentioned in
 the documentation?  And is there a comparable exact sequence for the
 "true" Selmer group consisting of the elements giving unramified
 extensions of ''K''?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16456#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to