#16644: LinearCode.cardinality category breakage
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ppurka | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: coding theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen,
Punarbasu Purkayastha | Punarbasu Purkayastha, Travis
Report Upstream: N/A | Scrimshaw
Branch: | Work issues:
public/categories/new_parent_linear_codes-16644| Commit:
Dependencies: | 709878e72911d2630a021ed0485c4d7a099abaff
| Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by ppurka):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: Punarbasu Purkayastha, Travis Scrimshaw => Nathann Cohen,
Punarbasu Purkayastha, Travis Scrimshaw
Comment:
This looks good to me. It passes all sage doctests and fails in 3 places
which are due to gap (see #16660).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16644#comment:30>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
