#10716: Adding a weighted_degree function to Singular multivariate polynomials
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jsrn | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: algebraic | Resolution:
geometry | Merged in:
Keywords: multivariate | Reviewers: Marshall Hampton
polynomials,degree,Singular | Work issues:
Authors: Johan S. R. | Commit:
Nielsen, Luis Felipe Tabera | 811b79657358bcc6c1201715cd35ffab9a42e346
Alonso | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/lftabera/weighted_degree |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by john_perry):
Replying to [comment:35 lftabera]:
> Do you mean comparing the cost of weighted_degree with
addition/multiplication?
I mean comparing the cost of, say, addition in a ring with Integer
weighted orders vs. addition in a ring with int weighted orders. Use the
same polynomials in the same base field. Then try with multiplication.
I have no particular ring in mind; I'm curious about all the "usual"
rings: QQ['''x'''], '''F''',,''p'',,['''x'''], etc.
> I expect that addition can be in fact faster that weighted degree for
"nice" rings and multiplication will be much slower.
Why?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10716#comment:36>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
