#16709: IncidenceStructure.packing
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Dima Pasechnik
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ncohen/16709 | 3a6f43dcc6e02bf7261e5ac809fa8bf0b4c4c582
Dependencies: #16701 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yo !
Thanks for the review !
> By the way, I noticed weirdness in `designs.steiner_quadruple_system` --
these guys aren't `Incidence system`, they are just dumps of tuples...
Well, write a ticket if you care (I will review it), otherwise I'll do it
someday. I was against it some time ago, but that was before Vincent's
patch to renovate the incidence structure code. It used to be buggy and
unmaintained, but now it is on a better road. Let's use it.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16709#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
