#16878: faster is_prime
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  number theory      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Vincent            |    Reviewers:  Jeroen Demeyer
  Delecroix, Jeroen Demeyer          |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  f0d716fd34029f65d0be0aa45d5cb1783f8da2f5
  u/vdelecroix/16878                 |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #15767             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Replying to [comment:25 jdemeyer]:
 > Replying to [comment:23 vdelecroix]:
 > > Great! I especially like that now `isprimepower` is accessible.
 > >
 > > In my last commit, I added the keyword `certificate` to
 `is_prime_power` in order to get back the pair (n,p) such that the integer
 is p^n^ (following pari convention). I think it is worth it!
 > I like the idea, but I'm not sure that I like the interface with the
 `certificate` keyword.
 >
 > How about a separate method `write_as_prime_power()` (raising
 `ArithmeticError` if it's not a prime power) or something?

 Note that there is already `factor` that does the job. Moreover, having
 two methods (`is_prime_power` and `write_as_prime_power`) with the exact
 same code looks bad as well. From my implementation, it is clear that the
 `certificate` keyword only modifies the output.

 My design choice also comes from the fact that this `certifcate` keyword
 is already in use (see `sage.graphs` or `sage.combinat.designs`). I am not
 particularly happy with it but I find it better than having two functions.

 On the other hand, treating a Python exception takes time, and this
 `is_prime_power` is the kind of function that I might use in time critical
 code.

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16878#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to