#16878: faster is_prime
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  number theory      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Vincent Delecroix  |    Reviewers:  Jeroen Demeyer
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/vdelecroix/16878                 |  d55dc6737936077eeee903687207f7af54588439
   Dependencies:  #15767             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Old description:

> Right now to test if a Sage integer is prime it is faster to call
> `prime_range` rather than `.is_prime()`...
> {{{
> sage: timeit("bool(prime_range(121,122))", number=10000)
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 1.09 µs per loop
> sage:  timeit("bool(prime_range(1009,1010))", number=10000)
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 1.2 µs per loop
> }}}
> versus
> {{{
> sage: timeit("121.is_prime()", number=10000)
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 5.3 µs per loop
> sage: timeit("1009.is_prime()", number=10000)
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 4.19 µs per loop
> }}}
>
> The patch does some tiny modifications in `integer.pyx` and we get
> {{{
> sage: timeit("121.is_prime()", number=10000)
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 812 ns per loop
> sage: timeit("1009.is_prime()", number=10000)
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 730 ns per loop
> }}}

New description:

 Right now to test if a Sage integer is prime it is faster to call
 `prime_range` rather than `.is_prime()`...
 {{{
 sage: timeit("bool(prime_range(121,122))", number=10000)
 10000 loops, best of 3: 1.09 µs per loop
 sage:  timeit("bool(prime_range(1009,1010))", number=10000)
 10000 loops, best of 3: 1.2 µs per loop
 }}}
 versus
 {{{
 sage: timeit("121.is_prime()", number=10000)
 10000 loops, best of 3: 5.3 µs per loop
 sage: timeit("1009.is_prime()", number=10000)
 10000 loops, best of 3: 4.19 µs per loop
 }}}

 The patch does some tiny modifications in `integer.pyx` and we get
 {{{
 sage: timeit("121.is_prime()", number=10000)
 10000 loops, best of 3: 812 ns per loop
 sage: timeit("1009.is_prime()", number=10000)
 10000 loops, best of 3: 730 ns per loop
 }}}

 We also modify `is_prime_power()` to return `False` for 1.

--

Comment (by jdemeyer):

 Big reviewer patch coming up...

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16878#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to