#13682: No coercion map with quotients of ring quotients
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim             |        Owner:  tscrim
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  coercion           |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  ideal, quotient,   |    Merged in:
  coercion                           |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw   |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  d93512419089b35d11d0c05a3533a80eb41a5790
  public/coercion/between_quotient_rings-13682|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Travis Scrimshaw', 'oldvalue': ''}):

 * status:  new => needs_review
 * commit:   => d93512419089b35d11d0c05a3533a80eb41a5790
 * branch:   => public/coercion/between_quotient_rings-13682
 * author:   => Travis Scrimshaw


Comment:

 We have to do an ideal membership test, which means computing Groebner
 bases. However it now returns the correct (or at least more intuitive)
 answer. Needs review.
 ----
 New commits:
 
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=d93512419089b35d11d0c05a3533a80eb41a5790
 d935124]||{{{Expanded coercions between quotient rings.}}}||

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13682#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to