#17051: PentagonPoset and DiamondPoset, default argument for facade
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/strange_bug_in_poset_show__|
d19213cf6dead1a87dc053e95be5d593ab9cfff0
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Hello !
> I think that it was irrelevant in this context. Also note about
`DiamondPoset` seems to be at wrong place inside docstring of
`PentagonPoset`.
Why do you think that it is irrelevant here ? It is a docstring about an
object, so why don't we show its nice properties ? This sage software is
all about checking on computers what we can prove on paper anyway `:-)`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17051#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
