#14683: New datastructure for iet
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: iet, flat | Merged in:
surfaces | Reviewers:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | db9430e3dfa371ac37f9842974d3fc3e7d35f3fa
public/ticket/14683 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):
* status: needs_review => needs_info
Comment:
What's your justification for removing doctests like
{{{
TESTS::
sage: t(-3/2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: value must positive and smaller than length
}}}
and replacing the `raise ValueError` with an `assert`?
(note that I don't really care about this ticket, I am just looking for
abuses of `assert`)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14683#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
