#14683: New datastructure for iet
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: iet, flat | Merged in:
surfaces | Reviewers:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | db9430e3dfa371ac37f9842974d3fc3e7d35f3fa
public/ticket/14683 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Replying to [comment:15 jdemeyer]:
> What's your justification for removing doctests like
> {{{
> TESTS::
>
> sage: t(-3/2)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ...
> ValueError: value must positive and smaller than length
> }}}
> and replacing the `raise ValueError` with an `assert`?
Bad design choice ;-P
This ticket is pending since it needs some more intensive testing/proof of
concepts.
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14683#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
