#15282: Labelling of product posets seem to normalize the labels of the posets
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-
Component: categories | duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Keywords: posets, | Resolution:
finite_posets, sage-combinat | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):
* status: new => needs_review
* cc: jmantysalo (added)
* milestone: sage-6.4 => sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Comment:
I didn't notice this and did #17060 as a new ticket. I suggest this to be
closed as a duplicate.
I too think that `product`, `disjoint_union` and `ordinal_sum` might have
versions for getting `(a,b,c)` instead of `((a,b),c)`. However, it is easy
relabeling with `lambda l: (l[0][0], l[0][1], l[1])`. Maybe add a note of
this to doc of `product`? See #17053 and documentation of
`disjoint_union`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15282#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
