#17063: Fix numerical noise after #16858
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jdemeyer           |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  positive_review
       Priority:  blocker            |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  doctest coverage   |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jeroen Demeyer     |    Reviewers:  Frédéric Chapoton
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/jdemeyer/ticket/17063            |  23c88bcab7f6234630367d007789906807b873d8
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by chapoton):

 * status:  needs_review => positive_review
 * reviewer:   => Frédéric Chapoton


Comment:

 I think this is good to go, because this only let the precision be
 slightly lower than before. So it can not introduce any new failing
 doctest, in principle.

 Am I correct to say that this is in particular needed to cure some of the
 buildbot failures ?

 Let me give a positive review, even if the blocker status is rather
 worrying to me. I hope I did not miss the point.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17063#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to