#17063: Fix numerical noise after #16858
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: doctest coverage | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers: Frédéric Chapoton
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/17063 | 23c88bcab7f6234630367d007789906807b873d8
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by chapoton):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => Frédéric Chapoton
Comment:
I think this is good to go, because this only let the precision be
slightly lower than before. So it can not introduce any new failing
doctest, in principle.
Am I correct to say that this is in particular needed to cure some of the
buildbot failures ?
Let me give a positive review, even if the blocker status is rather
worrying to me. I hope I did not miss the point.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17063#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.