#17138: LatticePoset: complements() is broken
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/latticeposet__complements___is_broken|
cf4f72988a9910e9e64bbef4653524b59af5c67b
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yo !
> What??? Is `sorted('a', 42)` architecture-dependent? I understand that
`print {'a':'b', 42:43}` is, but that is different thing.
Oh sorry, perhaps not architecture dependent but 'unreliable'. It may even
change on the same computer I guess, but I have no idea. Volker will know.
In Sage, however, I was told that dictionaries output is sorted first, so
that should be equivalent as far as doctests are concerned.
> Documentation says if comment ''contains'' strgin "random", then it will
not be tested. So one could write for example "Slightly random due
numerical approximations". But not an important thing.
Yeah but then people come and say that you should not put too many words
there, because your 'random order' doctest will also be tested if you do
--optional=order
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17138#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
