#17138: LatticePoset: complements() is broken
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/latticeposet__complements___is_broken|
cf4f72988a9910e9e64bbef4653524b59af5c67b
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jmantysalo):
Thanks Volker. From the user perspective I think that `do_something() -->
some_output` is much better example than `do_something()==some_output -->
True`.
I was thinking about usual convention of having `0` and `1` as bottom and
top element of a lattice. Maybe `'0'` instead of `0` is better. I will
think this later (but polishind documentation on posets will go before
lattices). For now this can be as it is.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17138#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
