#17166: Add coercion complex -> CC
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: coercion | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/17166 | d00b70614ae504cec82bd75de9e1147204b25944
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vbraun):
* cc: robertwb (added)
Comment:
I also noticed that we have coercions both way CDF <-> CC. This sounds a
bit wonky, IMHO it shoud be `ComplexField(>=53)` -> `CDF` ->
`ComplexField(<53)`. Though this has been around for a long time, perhaps
there is a deeper reason for that? Maybe Robert knows? Possibly stuff for
another ticket, though.
What I originally meant was just that Python `complex` should coerce to
CDF and not CC.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17166#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
