#17194: Minimal bindings for optional arb package; RealIntervalFieldElement.psi
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: cheuberg | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: arb, digamma | Merged in:
function, real interval field | Reviewers:
Authors: Clemens Heuberger | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 4a343229803c8b3dafec47fb13cb12e49e51bdb6
u/cheuberg/rings/real_arb | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #16747 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by fredrik.johansson):
Sage should arguably have a {{{RealBallField}}} and {{{ComplexBallField}}}
with concrete implementations {{{RealBallField_arb}}} and
{{{ComplexBallField_arb}}} (it would be useful to provide alternative
implementations, for example to provide actual circular complex balls).
Anyway, I took a quick look at the code, and it seems fine to me.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17194#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
