#17196: Relax assumptions on bitset operations
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jdemeyer           |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  misc               |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jeroen Demeyer     |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:  public/17196       |       Commit:
  /relax-assumptions-on-bitset-      |  3ae75a1f8fcfee0f78faf9bb4bb006149b535c45
  operations                         |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 What I try to do next: Empty bitsets.

 Question: Should one perhaps create different functions
 `bitset_init_copy(res,src)` vs. `bitset_realloc_copy(res,src)`, where in
 the first it is assumed that `res` is not initialised, whereas the second
 function will override previous contents of `res`? And similar for other
 functions such as shift?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17196#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to