#17196: Relax assumptions on bitset operations
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer, | Reviewers:
Simon King | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/17196 | 3ae75a1f8fcfee0f78faf9bb4bb006149b535c45
/relax-assumptions-on-bitset- | Stopgaps:
operations |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Jeroen Demeyer, Simon King', 'oldvalue': u'Jeroen
Demeyer'}):
* status: new => needs_review
* author: Jeroen Demeyer => Jeroen Demeyer, Simon King
Comment:
Anyway, if you think that there should be no empty bitset and if you agree
that it should be moved to sage.data_structures.bitset, then it needs
review, since all tests pass and the doc correctly appears in
sage.data_structures.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17196#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
