#17196: Relax assumptions on bitset operations
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer, | Reviewers:
Simon King | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 23762a31e383d765cbfe6d5bf958d5d592e1513d
u/jdemeyer/ticket/17196 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:22 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:21 ncohen]:
> > data structure code in both `data_structure/` and `misc/`.
> and in `structure/` and in `matroids/` and in `combinat/` and probably
other places...
Nathann, if I understand correctly, the plan is to eventually move
- all sage-specific data structures (e.g.,, those that only make sense
within Sage's coercion framework) to `structure`,
- all data structures that make sense without Sage and are not tied to a
specific mathematical topic (bitsets, bitmatrices, bounded integer
sequences, the dictionaries that are currently defined in
`sage.structure.coerce_dict`) to `data_structures`
and then `misc` should be reserved to miscellaneous ''mathematical''
topics (I think this is the definition according to the docs).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17196#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
