#17216: Poset / LatticePoset: [meet|join]matrix algorithm
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/poset___latticeposet___meet_join_matrix_algorithm|
a649be931b249028ff1e5961fc948c2daf50c695
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jmantysalo):
Replying to [comment:14 ncohen]:
> Please don't change the status of a ticket that has been reviewed unless
you see something which is actually wrong. Something more important than
moving a 'for' around.
But Travis had also other points. It does not bother me, because this is
an enhancement, not a bug (and nothing like changing `O(2^n)` to `O(n^2)`
or similar).
I don't quite get this category thing. For example there is no category
for semilattices, but there is for lattices if I remember correctly. But
anyways, I'll put a deprecation to categories code.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17216#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
