#16331: Game Theory: Build capacity to solve matching games in to Sage.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Matching Games, | Reviewers: Karl-Dieter Crisman,
Authors: Vince Knight, | Travis Scrimshaw
James Campbell | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 4d64661ef4f207defa80af7886bebbf467eca33c
u/vinceknight/game_theory__build_capacity_to_solve_matching_games_in_to_sage_|
Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vinceknight):
Ok so I've gone ahead and changed the test in the spots where we had
strange dictionaries with a mixture of key types.
They now all pass on both my machines.
I haven't gone with jdemeyer's suggestion (very humbly and of course happy
to change it). I felt that going through the keys individually was perhaps
more helpful from the point of view of documentation (I agree that from
the point of view of tests that the suggestion is better as it corresponds
to a single test instead of 3). Let me know what you think.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16331#comment:127>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
