#16331: Game Theory: Build capacity to solve matching games in to Sage.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Matching Games, | Reviewers: Karl-Dieter Crisman,
Authors: Vince Knight, | Travis Scrimshaw
James Campbell | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | f9388c72ebdefe9ada87f45eb93bc8e33e0bc67b
u/vinceknight/game_theory__build_capacity_to_solve_matching_games_in_to_sage_|
Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
For future reference, Karl brings up a good distinction, `==` does not
have to mean isomorphic, even for canonical isomorphisms (as often times
in Sage, for example `QQ['x','y'] == QQ['y','x']` is `False`).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16331#comment:136>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
