#6362: [with spkg, positive review] Singular and GCC 4.4
-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------
Reporter: aginiewicz | Owner:
tbd
Type: defect | Status:
closed
Priority: blocker | Milestone:
sage-4.1
Component: algebra | Resolution:
fixed
Keywords: | Reviewer:
John Perry, Robert Miller
Author: Andrzej Giniewicz, Martin Albrecht, Craig Citro | Merged:
sage-4.1.rc0
-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------
Comment(by aginiewicz):
Replying to [comment:29 GeorgSWeber]:
> As contained in Sage-4.1.rc0, singular-3-1-0-4-20090703.spkg does not
even build on OS X, neither 10.4 nor 10.5. Changing the line 201 in
/src/factory/GNUmakefile.in:
> {{{
> factoryobj := $(factorysrc:%.cc=%.o) $(factorysrc:%.y=%.o)
> }}}
> into the following two lines:
> {{{
> factoryobj := $(factorysrc:%.cc=%.o)
> factoryobj := $(factoryobj:%.y=%.o)
> }}}
> made the resulting Singular spkg build on OS X 10.4. But after
installing it into Sage-4.1.rc0, Sage doesn't even start, it fails with:
> {{{
> ImportError: dlopen(/Users/Shared/sage/sage-4.1.rc0/local/lib/python2.6
/site-packages/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.so, 2):
Symbol not found: ___eprintf
> Referenced from:
/Users/Shared/sage/sage-4.1.rc0/local/lib//libsingular.dylib
> Expected in: dynamic lookup
> }}}
> This might be due to the fact that I had dropped in the 3.1.0.2 Singular
spkg before, so I am re-running the build from the start. (I doubt that
it'll help, but let's see.)
>
> For the record, skipping through the install logs, I spotted another
error (this time "copy'n'paste") in the Singular 3.1.0.4 build scripts. In
/src/libfac/Makefile.in, the two identical lines 157/158 read:
> {{{
> -$(RANLIB) ${libdir}/libsingfac_g.a
> -$(RANLIB) ${libdir}/libsingfac_g.a
> }}}
> and it is obvious from the surrounding lines, that the line 158 should
end with "..._p.a" instead of "..._g.a".
>
> @Martin:
> Would you please report the findings so far upstream?
Oh, that's something already... but anyway, if I can suggest something,
maybe [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6470 #6470] would be
better for continuation of this (closed) ticket? It will be better exposed
that way I think
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6362#comment:30>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
