#17096: Implement categories for filtered algebras
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim             |        Owner:  tscrim
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  filtered algebras  |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw   |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/categories/filtered_algebras-17096|  
8a747c073e706950d1b14e77458539e126ff0550
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by darij):

 Enough for now (FPSAC deadline is approaching). I have now checked all of
 the non-Clifford/Weyl part of this patch, and here is all that I'd like to
 be done before the merge of this part:

 - TODO: Formulate an interface and a contract for
 `FilteredModulesWithBasis` objects. Is a `CombinatorialFreeModule` with a
 `degree_on_basis` method enough? Or is `basis` still needed? (See the
 `FIXME` in `src/sage/categories/examples/filtered_modules_with_basis.py`.)

 - TODO: Make sense of `A.basis(d)` for `A` a filtered module and `d` an
 integer. This has always been broken and we can leave it for later, but it
 then needs a trac ticket.

 - TODO: doctesting `A.basis(d)` for `A` graded. Very easy once above is
 fixed.

 - TODO: overriding the `to_graded_conversion`, `from_graded_conversion`
 and `projection` methods on graded algebras for the sake of speed, or
 deciding not to.

 - Generalizing `graded_algebra` to modules. This doesn't seem too
 difficult; I am in favor of keeping the name "associated graded *algebra*"
 even for modules, as it seems to have a ring to it that algebraists
 recognize, but maybe some discussion is in order.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17096#comment:60>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to