#17096: Implement categories for filtered algebras
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: tscrim
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: filtered algebras | Merged in:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/categories/filtered_algebras-17096|
8a747c073e706950d1b14e77458539e126ff0550
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jhpalmieri):
Replying to [comment:64 tscrim]:
> How is that any different for objects with multiple natural gradings?
It's the same issue.
> The main reason why I chose to use `grading` is so we don't have to
duplicate all of the code for graded algebras but just replacing `degree`
by `smallest_filtered_component` (or whatever name you want to call it).
My main concern is that I want to be able to have a graded algebra with an
additional filtration on it (ideally so that the associated graded algebra
is bigraded). I think you said (or someone said) that this could be done
with some reworking of the code in this branch. If that's accurate, then
it seems like it would be better to have more flexible code that could
handle this right from the start, instead of implementing it one way and
then rewriting it later on.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17096#comment:67>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
