#16333: Game Theory: build capacity to use gambit to solve Normal Form Games.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Normal Form Games | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 217690515a9355c2d04ca2947c203ecced7979b8
u/vinceknight/game_theory__build_class_for_normal_form_games_as_well_as_ability_to_obtain_nash_equilibria|
Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #16466 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
> I **really** like the idea you had [https://github.com/theref/sage-game-
theory/issues/19#issuecomment-45208259 here]:
> > with normal form games, we might have a prebuilt Matching Pennies game
that the user could load,
> Yes! Just like
> {{{
> sage: graphs.[tab]
> graphs.Balaban10Cage
> graphs.Balaban11Cage
> graphs.BalancedTree
> graphs.BarbellGraph
> graphs.BidiakisCube
> graphs.BiggsSmithGraph
> graphs.BishopGraph
> graphs.BrinkmannGraph
> <snip>
> sage: matroids.[tab]
> matroids.AG matroids.Uniform
matroids.named_matroids
> matroids.CompleteGraphic matroids.Wheel
> matroids.PG matroids.Whirl
> }}}
> This would be awesome, a built-in library one could explore of basic
examples.
This is now #17392.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16333#comment:32>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
