#17361: Poset: Add ordinal_product
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  jmantysalo             |       Status:  positive_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-wishlist
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:  Nathann Cohen
  combinatorics          |  Work issues:
       Keywords:  poset  |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  c59047103bc9cf22d2526c7ae146492fec92b698
  Frédéric Chapoton      |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/chapoton/17361       |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Yooooooo !

 > Code seems to be clear. Just to clarify to Nathann: I reported this one,
 but have not written any of the code. So thanks goes to Frédéric!

 Right right, all the commits are his !

 By the way, Jakob Kröker just sent me an email about Posets and I told him
 that you had a half-plan of adding some doc there.

 God, I should be sleeping `T_T`

 > I think that there is no need to have `sorted` on examples. They are
 kind of automatically sorted, when are all same type. But this is of
 course a minor thing.

 I don't know. Graphs+vertex labels mean dictionary somewhere, so I do not
 trust anything `^^;`

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17361#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to