#6344: Typesetting partial derivatives in new symbolics
---------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: gmhossain | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Burcin Erocal | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by schymans):
Thanks for the quick answer! From the user's perspective, the best way
would be to have an option similar to derivative_func in the function
definition, allowing to define the notation for derivatives. The efforts
required seems indeed amazingly high.
Wouldn't it be possible to write some parsing code to convert something
like D[0,1](f)(x,y) to any kind of notation? It should even be possible to
convert it back to diff(f(x,y),x,y), as requested here:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel/58040
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6344#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
