#6344: Typesetting partial derivatives in new symbolics
---------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: gmhossain | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Burcin Erocal | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by schymans):
I see. Would it be easier to allow the user to define custom latex
representations for just some standard differentials one anticipates when
defining a function? For all others, the system could fall back to the
D[0,1] (f)(x,z) notation. A simple replacement rule when latexing an
expression could do it.
By the way, it took me a quite some time of digging in the code to
understand the meaning of e.g. D[0,1](f)(x,z). Now that I have understood
it, I see its use. I was expecting a description in the documentation of
the diff() or differential() command, but I didn't find it there. Where is
the right place to look?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6344#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
