#16333: Game Theory: build capacity to use gambit to solve Normal Form Games.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Normal Form Games | Reviewers: Jeroen Demeyer
Authors: Vincent Knight, | Work issues:
James Campbell | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | aa5a8f7498143db87a93dad2a9bac875d812e863
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/16333 |
Dependencies: #16466 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
Quite minor comments:
* ` # optional - LCP` - should this be gambit?
* `the output differs to the other algorithms` - ''from'' the other ones?
I ended up wrapping presents long enough that I won't get to a final
review until Monday, but on the surface it looks like everything is just
fine, I just want to make sure there isn't some edge case in the parsing
and that the equilibria are okay. I am really surprised I missed so many
formatting things before - thanks, Jeroen!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16333#comment:61>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
