#16333: Game Theory: build capacity to use gambit to solve Normal Form Games.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Normal Form Games | Reviewers: Jeroen Demeyer
Authors: Vincent Knight, | Work issues:
James Campbell | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 0c6cc6534650629c3ba127ff34c14ffa14fb09b0
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/vinceknight/gambit_integration |
Dependencies: #16466 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vinceknight):
Replying to [comment:66 kcrisman]:
> {{{
> +It is also possible to generate a Normal Form Game from a gambit Game::
> +
> }}}
> This would be a good place to refer to the gambit document or remind why
there are all these `int`s.
I've added a pointer to the gambit documentation. Let me know if you think
I've said too much/little.
>
> > is evidenced by the two algorithms returning different solutions::
>
> Maybe better now is "the various algorithms"?
Yup: have put that in.
>
> Finally, I think the parser is working fine but could use a little extra
tlc if and when games with more than 2 players are implemented, as it is a
very long series of things to parse for the reader (I mean the code like
`profile.append(tuple(gambitstrategy[previousplayerstrategylength:
previousplayerstrategylength + len(player.strategies)]))`) though I agree
it should work correctly.
I agree, I'm hoping that future dev will further integrate all the gambit
algorithms, as this happens the parser will be in turn expanded. The next
thing I'll be working on is #17392 though :)
>
> I don't see any other issues. Thanks for breaking all of these tickets
apart! It really made it a lot easier to get figured out.
Thank you for all your help: I'm planning on finding time to try and
review some tickets myself :)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16333#comment:68>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
