#17540: Poset.dimension
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  ncohen                 |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.5
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:
  combinatorics          |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  216d59efca2e03ebce6e9fd76f150abb32e369d5
  Nathann Cohen          |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/ncohen/17540         |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 > Concerning the `certificate`, it looks like a half-certificate ; is the
 algorithm able to provide an evidence that no smaller set of linear
 ordering can generate the poset by intersection ?

 No it cannot. The problem is NP, so there is a certificate for a 'yes'
 answer, but it is not co-NP so there is no certificate for the other side.
 (Insert 'polynomial' wherever it fits in the sentence, and assume P!=NP)

 > Also, the "just to be sure" section at the end of the code should be run
 only if some `check` option is set to `True` since the algorithm is
 supposed to work without this ?

 I do not think that it should, considering the running time of the
 algorithm. That's almost for free comparatively, so I don't see the need
 to make it optional.

 > By the way, in the `INPUT` section, it seems more common to write
 {{{``certificate`` - boolean (default: ``False``)}}} than to write the
 default at the end of the description (i first thought the information was
 missing).

 Well I usually write it the way it is written. If you want to change it
 you are welcome to add a commit, but if it is just about enforcing the
 coding style you like I will not code it for you `:-P`

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17540#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to