#17540: Poset.dimension
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.5
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 216d59efca2e03ebce6e9fd76f150abb32e369d5
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/17540 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> There seems to be no check for argument, i.e. `certificate='cat-says-
meow'` does not raise an error. Should it?
I do not think that there should, especially when the argument is boolean
(not even a string) and when it does not produce any bug whatever happens.
Chekking this kind of stuff is useful when a string is expected, but
really if we begin to check every single arguments of every function like
that, then half of the python code we have in Sage will be checking the
type of input because Python does not do it instead.
> One-line explanation on TOC should end with dot.
Done
> Does this work with empty poset? Checking just now, but compiling is
slooow with this machine.
Done (Jori: we have a 4h30 difference in our timezones)
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17540#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
