#17557: creating a (136,4,1)-BIBD raises an exception
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 84734503c0cf6090a7411087aaae9564098d0547
u/vdelecroix/17557 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yo !
> The values from `0` to `99` were already tested in a loop above. And it
would be better if the specific value `v=136` is tested alone. See my
commit.
Oh, sorry. But instead of this complicated loop with random values and the
if to set the modulos right, could you just change the 100 to 400 ? It
takes 3 seconds, and is way more systematic and easier to read.
Thanks for the speedup in steiner triple systems.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17557#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
