#17557: creating a (136,4,1)-BIBD raises an exception
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 31cee6143c9157273d33dc1d311f288cc0eaf3b5
u/vdelecroix/17557 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yooooooooo !
Well, I still don't know why you care so much about avoiding 13 BIBD of
small size... Nor why you want to have a doctest for 136 right before
having a doctest for 13-400.. But WELL, this is fixed `:-D`
Can we set it to `positive review` or is there anything else ???
Thanks for your help,
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17557#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
