#12212: Colormap for implicit_plot3d and parametric_plot3d
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: niles | Owner: jason, was
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: graphics | Resolution:
Keywords: colormap, plot | Merged in:
Authors: Joris | Reviewers: Frédéric Chapoton,
Vankerschaver, Frédéric Chapoton | Niles Johnson
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: u/niles/12212 | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by niles):
* commit: 41fe504cbf6dc5244e22bfd6dd4b374fd7d1eb28 =>
* branch: u/chapoton/12212 => u/niles/12212
Comment:
Ok, I've made some very minimal changes so that the `color` keyword is
used instead of `color_data`. I think my complaints are really related to
larger issues in the plotting code, and I should stop getting in the way
of this ticket.
I also removed the stuff in `texture_map.py`, namely
`GradualTextureTransform` and related classes. I don't think it offers
substantially different functionality from what's available in the rest of
this patch (although it is slightly different, of course). I just
couldn't find a strong justification for keeping it even though I'd like
to. Please correct me if I'm wrong!
My changes are on the new branch `u/niles/12212`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12212#comment:80>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
