#17571: Method tracing fixture
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: gagern | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: doctest framework | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Martin von Gagern | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/gagern/ticket/17571 | e3093ed9167903328b40ccfa5f0d41729d07021d
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by gagern):
Replying to [comment:5 niles]:
> I'm confused about the docstring for `reproducible_repr` saying "All
types which require special handling are covered by the examples below".
Aren't dicts an obvious case that also would require special handling?
You are right, the documentation was misleading. The section was more
about types for which I ''have'' special handling. There might be more
types (e.g. `dict` at the time you read the code) which would ''require''
such handling but didn't receive it. I've clarified things now, and also
added handling for `dict` and `list`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17571#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
