#15593: sqlalchemy should not be standard package
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ohanar | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: R. Andrew Ohana | Work issues: rebase
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | d701c15354193da3ba02762ca61e6763a74b6b40
u/ohanar/optionalize | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tmonteil):
I am finishing a kind of audit of packages in Sage, and noticed sqlalchemy
was useless (and bitrotting for a while). Since there is no interaction
with Sage (nor sagenb), i think removing it is a better option than
updating it and make it optional. There will be less work to do, and `sage
-pip install sqlalchemy` will let the user have the latest version (or
even any other version if needed).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15593#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
