#15593: sqlalchemy should not be standard package
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ohanar | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: R. Andrew Ohana, | Work issues: rebase
Jeroen Demeyer | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 2c40f5eb5d5ff3e10c415fbc33778fcb8002a47b
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/15593 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
I would actually not get rid of the line in the db file, since (in
principle) someone ambitious could do that someday and it's only in a todo
list. We aren't saying we hate sqlalchemy, just that there is no reason
to include it in sage-the-distro right now.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15593#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
