#17583: Clean up free module elements
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: linear algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers: Marc Mezzarobba
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/17583 | a6d357a8b2874aaec970aa0d2afc3fa14d60969e
Dependencies: #17561 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:9 mmezzarobba]:
> Regarding your last commit, I agree with the changes, but I don't
understand why `dot_product` is defined in `FreeModuleElement` rather than
in `Vector`.
For consistency, I would prefer to keep `dot_product` in
`FreeModuleElement`. For `pairwise_product()` (which I didn't change), we
also have `pairwise_product` on the level of `FreeModuleElement` but
`_pairwise_product_` on the level of `Vector`. Further refactoring would
need to involve all kinds of products (dot, cross and pairwise) and I
would prefer not to do this now.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17583#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
