#12449: Improve the way that sage evaluates symbolic functions on basic types
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: bober | Owner: bober
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: gamma function | Merged in:
Authors: Jonathan Bober, | Reviewers: Burcin Erocal,
Burcin Erocal | Jonathan Bober
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: #4498, #12507, | Stopgaps:
#9130 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by rws):
The patch actually contains code that switches FP `sage_tgamma1` from GSL
to `python_gamma` which might be a good thing, but requires a separate
ticket. The timings are identical, so I suspect that the implementation
might be too.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12449#comment:33>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
