#16697: implement symbolic lower incomplete gamma function
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: rws | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: gamma, | Merged in:
incomplete, special, functions | Reviewers:
Authors: Ralf Stephan | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | f8fcbc25f545e412f6c1cf18d58e7f50f4e44cb3
public/ticket/16697 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #17130 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by rws):
Replying to [comment:37 kcrisman]:
> > > Could we add the `gamma(a,0,x)` interface for the lower gamma?
''Should'' we?
> > A separate ticket, please?
> Seems quite reasonable. Do you agree this would be a useful addition?
I only mention it because it seems that at least a couple 'competitors'
support it, so presumably it is somewhat of a standard and not a surprise
if Sage implements it.
Any UI change that reduces surprise is fine with me. (Actually, I have a
GUI development history and have read and care much about this subject)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16697#comment:38>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
