#17637: Stopgap for IntegerListsLex
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  ncohen                 |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.5
  defect                 |   Resolution:
       Priority:         |    Merged in:
  blocker                |    Reviewers:
      Component:         |  Work issues:
  combinatorics          |       Commit:
       Keywords:         |  5f0062460c512ebf001e12632daadb25961e7c81
        Authors:         |     Stopgaps:
  Nathann Cohen          |
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  public/17637           |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by ncohen):

 * status:  needs_info => needs_review


Comment:

 > Since #17548 is about `min_slope`, shouldn't the warning be only if the
 `min_slope` argument was given?

 In the code, it is said that the constraints are "assumed to be correct".
 I have no idea what happens if `min_slope` is not defined by `max_slope`
 is, or `max_part` or anything.  If you believe that there is a situation
 in which the code will never return anything wrong you can adapt the error
 message.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17637#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to