#17637: Stopgap for IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen                         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect                         |       Status:  closed
       Priority:  blocker                        |    Milestone:  sage-6.5
      Component:  combinatorics                  |   Resolution:  fixed
       Keywords:                                 |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen                  |    Reviewers:  Jeroen
Report Upstream:  N/A                            |  Demeyer
         Branch:                                 |  Work issues:
  5f0062460c512ebf001e12632daadb25961e7c81       |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                                 |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by aschilling):

 * commit:  5f0062460c512ebf001e12632daadb25961e7c81 =>


Comment:

 As far as I can see from #17548 there are actually no known bugs with
 regards to IntegerListsLex. So I find it a total overreaction to put a
 stopgap as the limitations of IntegerListsLex are correctly documented.
 Now warnings appear in many parts of the code which are completely
 unrelated to this issue (and as I said, there does not appear to be a
 bug). For example
 {{{
 sage: K = crystals.KirillovReshetikhin(['D',4,1],1,1)
 /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-
 packages/sage/combinat/partition.py:4827:
 
********************************************************************************
 This code contains bugs and may be mathematically unreliable.
 This issue is being tracked at
 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/17548.
 
********************************************************************************
 }}}
 or
 {{{
 sage: Partitions(3,max_part=2)
 /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-
 packages/sage/combinat/partition.py:6622:
 
********************************************************************************
 This code contains bugs and may be mathematically unreliable.
 This issue is being tracked at
 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/17548.
 
********************************************************************************
 Partitions of 3 having parts less than or equal to 2
 }}}
 both of which are totally fine!

 Best,

 Anne

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17637#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to